🌿 The ESG Dispatch

Regulatory & Policy "Delhi's EV rulebook, a COP33 exit, and a voluntary BRSR window that won't stay voluntary for long."

Climate Diplomacy

India Quietly Withdraws Bid to Host COP33 in 2028, Leaving Climate Summit Without an Asian Host

India's Ministry of Environment official Rajat Agarwal informed the chair of the UN Asia-Pacific Group on 8 April that India is withdrawing its COP33 candidacy — the bid to host the 2028 UN climate summit — "following a review of its commitments for the year 2028." The withdrawal was not publicly announced by the Indian government and came with no explanation. Prime Minister Modi had originally made the offer in December 2023; the BRICS group had formally welcomed India's candidacy in July 2025. India had created a dedicated cell within the climate division of the environment ministry to prepare for the summit. The withdrawal leaves COP33 — following COP31 in Türkiye and COP32 in Ethiopia — without a confirmed host.

Source: Climate Home News / The Print / ETV Bharat (8 April 2026)

Context: The optics are awkward: India withdrew its COP33 bid the same week it celebrated crossing 150 GW of solar and ranking 3rd globally in renewables. Hosting COP would have been a platform to showcase India's energy transition on the world stage. The timing and silence suggest the decision is logistical or geopolitical — the year 2028 is India's election cycle and the cost of hosting a 30,000-delegate UN summit is substantial. For the global climate community: Asia now needs a new host. South Korea, which finalised ISSB-aligned reporting this month, and Japan, with its new GX-ETS carbon market, are the obvious candidates. India's withdrawal is not a retreat from climate ambition — but it is a missed diplomatic opportunity.

Urban Mobility

Delhi Releases Draft EV Policy 2026: Tiered Subsidies, Scrapping Incentives, and a Four-Year Clean Mobility Push

The Delhi government released the draft Delhi Electric Vehicle Policy 2026–2030 on 11 April, seeking public feedback within 30 days. The policy targets all major vehicle segments with tiered incentives: two-wheelers get ₹10,000/kWh (up to ₹30,000) in Year 1, declining annually; three-wheeler auto-rickshaws receive ₹50,000 in Year 1; four-wheeler goods vehicles get ₹1,00,000. Scrapping incentives range from ₹10,000 for two-wheelers to ₹1,00,000 for cars (up to ₹30 lakh ex-showroom). The policy aims to cut vehicular pollution, expand charging infrastructure, and build a local EV supply chain including battery recycling and component recovery.

Source: IANS / Delhi Transport Department (11 April 2026)

Context: Delhi has 11 of the world's 20 most polluted cities in its immediate orbit. The capital's EV policy is therefore both a local air quality intervention and a national signal — Delhi policy often sets the template for other state capitals. The declining subsidy structure (₹10,000/kWh in Year 1 to ₹3,300/kWh in Year 3) is designed to front-load adoption before subsidies taper. For automakers: the goods vehicle incentives are the sleeper story — Delhi's massive last-mile delivery fleet (food, e-commerce, logistics) transitioning to EVs would be transformational for urban Scope 3 emissions. Mahindra, Piaggio, and Euler Motors are the likely beneficiaries.

Disclosure

BRSR Value Chain Disclosures Now Open: India's Top 250 Can Voluntarily Report Supply Chain ESG Data This Fiscal Year

FY2025–26 marks the first year India's top 250 listed companies may voluntarily include value chain ESG disclosures under SEBI's enhanced BRSR Core framework. Companies opting in report on suppliers and customers accounting for either 2% or more of total purchases/sales, or those covering 75% of aggregate procurement and sales value. Key performance indicators include GHG emissions intensity, water consumption, gender diversity, and waste generation across the supply chain. Third-party assessment of BRSR Core disclosures becomes mandatory from FY2026–27, covering the top 500 companies — making this year's voluntary window a preparation runway, not a free pass.

Source: SEBI / Seneca ESG / Mongabay India (April 2026)

Context: Voluntary today, mandatory tomorrow — SEBI's phased approach gives companies one fiscal year to build the data infrastructure before enforcement kicks in. For large listed companies, the 2% threshold means their top suppliers will increasingly receive ESG data requests even now, as early movers use voluntary disclosure to signal governance quality to investors. The companies that treat this year as a dress rehearsal will have a meaningful head start. Third-party verification in FY2026–27 closes the last loophole — so the window to get supply chain data systems in order is this fiscal year, not next.

Large Company Actions & Big Moves "150 GW solar, 56 GW wind, 283 GW non-fossil — and India only needs to triple it to hit 500 GW by 2030."

Renewables

India Crosses 150 GW Solar and 56 GW Wind in a Single Fiscal Year, Securing Third Place Globally in Renewable Energy

India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy confirmed this week that solar capacity has crossed 150.26 GW — driven by a record 44.61 GW of new solar installed in FY2025–26, including 14.45 GW in Q1 2026 alone. Wind power simultaneously achieved a historic milestone: 6.05 GW added in FY2025–26, the highest annual wind addition India has ever recorded, pushing cumulative wind to 56.09 GW. Total non-fossil installed capacity reached 283.46 GW as of 31 March 2026 (including 274.68 GW renewables and 8.78 GW nuclear). Union Minister Pralhad Joshi confirmed India is now the world's third-largest renewable energy nation, surpassing Brazil, behind only China (1,200+ GW) and the United States (~300 GW).

Source: MNRE / SolarQuarter / IANS (7–9 April 2026)

Context: The numbers are extraordinary but the gap to the 500 GW 2030 target is equally so — India needs to add ~217 GW more in four years, which requires sustaining or exceeding current annual additions of ~50 GW. The financing math is sobering: at $700–800/kW for solar, reaching 500 GW requires $150+ billion in remaining investment, largely debt-financed. The good news: India's cost of solar power now averages ₹2.60/kWh — among the lowest globally — which makes the economics compelling even without subsidies. Gujarat, Karnataka, and Maharashtra led this year's additions; Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh are the next frontier. Watch for green bond and infrastructure fund activity to accelerate accordingly.

Regulatory & Policy "GHG Protocol wants 95% of your emissions. Switzerland wants EU-grade due diligence. Canada wants a taxonomy. It's a busy week for mandatory disclosure."

Reporting

GHG Protocol Proposes Scope 3 Overhaul: 95% Coverage Mandate, New Category 16 for Facilitated Emissions

The GHG Protocol published proposed revisions to its Scope 3 Standard in April 2026, marking the most significant update to the world's dominant emissions accounting framework in over a decade. Key changes include: a mandatory 95% coverage requirement for Scope 3 emissions (replacing ambiguous language about accounting for "all" emissions); a new Category 16 covering "other value chain activities" including facilitated emissions and licensing arrangements; mandatory data quality disaggregation by type within each category; and reclassification of insurance and underwriting services to optional reporting. The GHG Protocol, founded by the World Resources Institute and WBCSD, underpins ISSB, ESRS, and virtually every major corporate emissions framework globally. A full draft standard is expected for public consultation later in 2026.

Source: ESG Today / GHG Protocol / World Resources Institute (9 April 2026)

Context: The 95% rule is the critical change. Today, companies routinely exclude inconvenient Scope 3 categories — particularly Category 15 (investments) and Category 11 (use of sold products) for energy and consumer goods companies. The new standard would make selective reporting structurally non-compliant. Category 16 is the sleeper provision: "facilitated emissions" could capture financial institutions' underwriting and market-making activities — an enormous and currently invisible slice of emissions responsibility. For Indian conglomerates reporting under BRSR: Scope 3 is currently treated as optional. The GHG Protocol's changes will ripple into ISSB and BRSR revisions within 2–3 reporting cycles.

Regulation

Switzerland Proposes Federal Corporate Sustainability Act: CSRD and CSDDD Alignment for ~130 Companies

The Swiss Federal Council launched a public consultation on 1 April 2026 for the draft Federal Act on Sustainable Corporate Governance (CSA), with comments accepted through 9 July 2026. The proposed law aligns Swiss sustainability obligations with EU CSRD and CSDDD: reporting requirements apply to companies with 1,000+ employees and CHF 450 million+ in turnover (approximately 100 companies), requiring disclosure under ESRS or equivalent standards; due diligence obligations apply to companies with 5,000+ employees and CHF 1.5 billion+ in turnover (approximately 30 companies), covering human rights and environmental risks in supply chains. Implementation is expected to begin in stages from 2027–2028.

Source: ESG Today / GRC Report / LALIVE Law (7 April 2026)

Context: Switzerland joining the EU sustainability disclosure orbit is significant for two reasons. First, it closes a major regulatory arbitrage loophole — multinationals that headquartered Swiss subsidiaries to escape CSRD will find limited relief. Second, it signals that ESRS is becoming the de facto global reporting standard for European-sphere companies, not just EU members. Norway, the UK (with its ISSB adoption), Switzerland, and now several non-EU economies are converging on aligned frameworks. For Indian multinationals with Swiss operations or supply chain relationships: ESG disclosure requests are coming from multiple directions simultaneously. Unified data infrastructure is no longer optional.

Taxonomy

Canada Launches Sustainable Finance Taxonomy Council: Six Priority Sectors, First Criteria by End of 2026

Business Future Pathways (BFP) announced on 10 April the formation of a 17-member Taxonomy Council, chaired by former AIMCo Chief Investment Officer Marlene Puffer, to oversee the development of Canada's sustainable finance taxonomy. The council will define green and transition investment criteria across six priority sectors — with the first three finalized by end of 2026 and the remaining three by end of 2027. The Canadian Climate Institute is leading research and technical development. The government committed to launching the taxonomy by end of 2026. Council members include independent experts, climate scientists, Indigenous representatives, financial sector professionals, and civil society members.

Source: ESG Today / Clean Energy Finance Corporation (10 April 2026)

Context: Canada is the last G7 economy to launch a sustainable finance taxonomy — a gap that has cost it in green capital flows. The timing is not coincidental: with US climate finance policy in retreat, Canada is positioning itself as the North American anchor for credible transition finance. The Indigenous representation on the council is notable given Canada's energy infrastructure track record. For the global taxonomy landscape: Canada, the EU, Singapore, India, and the UK now have formal taxonomy frameworks at various stages. This convergence is creating a de facto global template — companies that build taxonomy-aligned disclosure now are banking goodwill with every capital market simultaneously.

Large Company Actions & Big Moves "$2.2 billion for Asia renewables, $625 million for climate private markets, and Amazon's cloud now tells you exactly how much carbon you're burning."

Aviation Policy

Singapore Launches World's First Mandatory SAF Levy: Tickets Now Carry a Green Aviation Surcharge

Singapore became the world's first country to impose a mandatory Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) levy when ticket sales began attracting the charge from 1 April 2026. The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) introduced graduated fees by passenger class and route distance: economy passengers pay S$1.00–S$6.40 depending on destination; business class passengers pay up to S$41.60 for Americas-bound flights; cargo is charged per kilogram; private jets face per-aircraft fees (e.g., S$1,200 for a Gulfstream G650 to London). Funds flow into a statutory SAF Fund managed by CAAS and operated by Singapore Sustainable Aviation Fuel Company Ltd (SAFCo), which will purchase SAF and SAF environmental attributes on behalf of all Singapore-departing airlines. Singapore has set a 1% SAF target for 2026, rising to 3–5% by 2030.

Source: ESG Today / Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore / Flight Global (April 2026)

Context: Singapore just solved the classic SAF chicken-and-egg problem: airlines won't pay the SAF premium individually, but a pooled levy lets the entire aviation system share the cost and SAFCo can negotiate bulk SAF supply at scale. This is the most practical aviation decarbonisation policy enacted anywhere so far. For Indian aviation — which is on track to be the world's third-largest air travel market by 2030 — this is a direct template. India's DGCA has discussed SAF blending mandates but lacks a funding mechanism; Singapore's levy structure answers exactly that question. Indigo, Air India, and IndiSense operating Singapore routes will already be subject to this charge. Indian airports and policymakers should be watching closely.

Climate Tech

AWS Launches Sustainability Console: Companies Can Now Track Cloud Carbon Emissions by Scope, Region, and Service

Amazon Web Services launched its Sustainability Console in April 2026, enabling organisations to measure and report carbon emissions from their AWS cloud usage broken down by Scope 1, 2, and 3, geographic region, and individual service type. The tool supports both market-based and location-based calculation methods, offers API/SDK integration for embedding emissions data into existing reporting systems, and provides preset monthly and annual carbon reports. Crucially, it opens access to sustainability and reporting teams who typically lack billing console permissions — recognising that ESG officers, not just CTOs, need this data. The console is an expansion of AWS's earlier Customer Carbon Footprint Tool.

Source: ESG Today / AWS Blog (7 April 2026)

Context: Cloud computing now accounts for roughly 1–2% of global electricity consumption — and that share is growing fast as AI workloads scale. For companies reporting Scope 3 Category 8 (upstream cloud/IT services) under ISSB or ESRS: AWS's tool closes a major data gap. The significance isn't just measurement — it's the democratisation of carbon data to non-technical ESG teams who actually write sustainability reports. Expect Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure to follow with equivalent tools within months, triggering a standardisation race. For Indian IT services companies (Infosys, TCS, Wipro) managing client cloud workloads: carbon reporting of cloud services is becoming a procurement requirement, not a nice-to-have.

Climate Finance

Australian Ethical Launches A$625 Million Climate Private Markets Fund Targeting 11–13% Returns

Australian Ethical Investment launched its Growth Opportunities Fund with A$625 million in seed capital on 10 April, supported by a A$125 million cornerstone investment from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (Australia's green bank). Initial portfolio commitments include recycling infrastructure, battery storage, and renewable energy projects. The fund targets 11–13% annual returns after fees over a seven-year horizon and offers quarterly liquidity — an unusual feature in private markets. Investment themes span decarbonisation, digitalisation, circular economy, urbanisation, and changing demographics, with impact measurement applied to each investment.

Source: ESG Today / CEFC / Financial Standard (10 April 2026)

Context: The 11–13% return target with quarterly liquidity in a climate private markets vehicle is the headline structuring innovation here. Traditional infrastructure and climate funds lock up capital for 10+ years with illiquidity premiums — Australian Ethical is testing whether you can offer climate impact AND capital flexibility at scale. The CEFC cornerstone is the credibility anchor: Australia's green bank doesn't back speculative structures. For institutional capital allocators globally: this fund is a proof-of-concept that climate private markets don't need to trade off returns for impact. If the track record holds over Year 1, expect similar structures to emerge in Singapore, UK, and the EU in 2027.

Carbon & Decarbonisation "Microsoft buries 626,000 tonnes in Canadian forests. JPMorgan casts 60,000 tonnes in biomass blocks underground. Carbon removal week had receipts."

Carbon Removal

Microsoft Signs 15-Year BECCS Deal in Canada: 626,000 Tonnes of CDR with Indigenous Ownership Partnership

Microsoft signed a 15-year bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) agreement on 7 April with Svante, the Meadow Lake Tribal Council (MLTC), and North Star Carbon Solutions. The deal covers 626,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide removal credits over the contract term, with up to 90,000 tonnes annually at full scale. Carbon is captured at MLTC's existing forestry biomass cogeneration facility in Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan, and permanently stored at a geological site operated by North Star. The project is believed to be Canada's first BECCS project with Indigenous ownership — with MLTC holding a meaningful stake — and Microsoft's first BECCS deal in Canada. Microsoft is currently the world's largest corporate purchaser of carbon removal credits.

Source: ESG Today / Svante / Carbon Herald (7 April 2026)

Context: Microsoft's AI expansion is creating an enormous carbon liability — data centre electricity demand has roughly doubled since ChatGPT's launch, and the company's emissions rose 29% in FY2024. BECCS deals are Microsoft's primary offset vehicle for the residual gap between its RE100 electricity procurement and its net-negative 2030 target. The Indigenous ownership structure here is genuinely novel: MLTC's equity stake means carbon revenue flows to First Nations communities, addressing the "just transition" gap that haunts most carbon removal projects. For carbon markets: BECCS at 90,000 tonnes/year from a single Canadian facility is significant — this is the scale needed for CDR to move the needle on net zero math, not just corporate reporting.

Carbon Removal

JPMorgan Signs 10-Year Deal with Graphyte: 60,000 Tonnes of Biomass Carbon Removal That Also Prevents Wildfires

JPMorgan Chase announced on 9 April a 10-year carbon removal purchase agreement with Graphyte, covering 60,000 metric tons of CDR credits — the largest publicly disclosed deal for the Arkansas-based company. Graphyte uses "carbon casting": biomass waste is dried, condensed into blocks, and buried underground in sealed containers to prevent decomposition — permanently locking in the carbon. Credits will be delivered from Graphyte's operational Project Loblolly facility in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and Project Ponderosa in Flagstaff, Arizona (expected operational 2027). JPMorgan cited wildfire prevention and local economic benefits for ranchers and foresters as co-benefits beyond carbon sequestration. The bank will apply credits toward its residual Scope 3 emissions.

Source: ESG Dive / Axios / ESG Post (9 April 2026)

Context: JPMorgan's carbon removal portfolio is now substantial — this deal adds to earlier purchases from Charm Industrial, Heirloom Carbon, and others. The wildfire co-benefit angle is strategically timed: wildfire losses in the US West hit a record $50 billion in 2025, and insurers are repricing or withdrawing from wildfire-exposed regions. Biomass removal that reduces forest fuel loads is therefore simultaneously a carbon removal, a fire mitigation, and an insurance risk reduction play — three different sets of buyers in one product structure. For Indian reforestation and agroforestry projects seeking international carbon buyers: this deal structure — durable removal with verifiable co-benefits — is the benchmark Indian offset projects should be designing toward.

The ESG Dispatch

India

Global

🌿 Stay in the Loop